🎰Casino-360

Ultra Hot Deluxe vs Mega Joker: RTP, volatility and expected loss

Ultra Hot Deluxe returns 0.07 percentage points more than Mega Joker (95.17% vs 95.10%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 48.30 vs 49.00 — 0.70 apart. Volatility differs: medium for Ultra Hot Deluxe, low for Mega Joker — Ultra Hot Deluxe pays less often but in larger amounts.

Side by side

MetricUltra Hot DeluxeMega Joker
ProviderNovomaticNovomatic
RTP (provider-published)95.17%95.10%
Volatility (Casino-360 class)mediumlow
RTP rank in catalogHigher RTP than 25% of catalog slotsHigher RTP than 11% of catalog slots
Provider average RTP95.14%95.14%
Vs provider average+0.03 pp−0.04 pp

Catalog: 498 slots.

Expected loss at 1 credit per spin

SpinsUltra Hot DeluxeMega JokerDifference
1004.834.900.07
1,00048.3049.000.70
10,000483.00490.007.00

Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Ultra Hot Deluxe

GameProviderRTP
Dolphin's Pearl DeluxeNovomatic97.40%
Rage to RichesPlay'n GO97.12%
Royal MasqueradePlay'n GO96.92%

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Mega Joker

GameProviderRTP
Mystery JokerPlay'n GO96.98%
Lucky DiamondsPlay'n GO96.50%
Fruit ZenBetsoft96.32%

Play the free demos

Questions

Which has the higher RTP, Ultra Hot Deluxe or Mega Joker?

Ultra Hot Deluxe: 95.17% vs 95.10%.

What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?

Ultra Hot Deluxe: 48.30; Mega Joker: 49.00. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.

Can I play both for free?

Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.

Other comparisons

Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data