🎰Casino-360

Sizzling Hot Deluxe vs Ultra Hot Deluxe: RTP, volatility and expected loss

Sizzling Hot Deluxe returns 0.49 percentage points more than Ultra Hot Deluxe (95.66% vs 95.17%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 43.40 vs 48.30 — 4.90 apart. Both sit in the same volatility class (medium), so the swing between sessions is comparable.

Side by side

MetricSizzling Hot DeluxeUltra Hot Deluxe
ProviderNovomaticNovomatic
RTP (provider-published)95.66%95.17%
Volatility (Casino-360 class)mediummedium
RTP rank in catalogHigher RTP than 26% of catalog slotsHigher RTP than 25% of catalog slots
Provider average RTP95.14%95.14%
Vs provider average+0.52 pp+0.03 pp

Catalog: 498 slots.

Expected loss at 1 credit per spin

SpinsSizzling Hot DeluxeUltra Hot DeluxeDifference
1004.344.830.49
1,00043.4048.304.90
10,000434.00483.0049.00

Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Sizzling Hot Deluxe

GameProviderRTP
Dolphin's Pearl DeluxeNovomatic97.40%
Rage to RichesPlay'n GO97.12%
Royal MasqueradePlay'n GO96.92%

Play the free demos

Questions

Which has the higher RTP, Sizzling Hot Deluxe or Ultra Hot Deluxe?

Sizzling Hot Deluxe: 95.66% vs 95.17%.

What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?

Sizzling Hot Deluxe: 43.40; Ultra Hot Deluxe: 48.30. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.

Can I play both for free?

Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.

Other comparisons

Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data