🎰Casino-360

Book of Dead vs Book of Ra Deluxe: RTP, volatility and expected loss

Book of Dead returns 1.11 percentage points more than Book of Ra Deluxe (96.21% vs 95.10%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 37.90 vs 49.00 — 11.10 apart. Both sit in the same volatility class (high), so the swing between sessions is comparable.

Side by side

MetricBook of DeadBook of Ra Deluxe
ProviderPlay'n GONovomatic
RTP (provider-published)96.21%95.10%
Volatility (Casino-360 class)highhigh
RTP rank in catalogHigher RTP than 42% of catalog slotsHigher RTP than 11% of catalog slots
Provider average RTP96.44%95.14%
Vs provider average−0.23 pp−0.04 pp

Catalog: 498 slots.

Expected loss at 1 credit per spin

SpinsBook of DeadBook of Ra DeluxeDifference
1003.794.901.11
1,00037.9049.0011.10
10,000379.00490.00111.00

Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Book of Dead

GameProviderRTP
Mystery Joker 6000Play'n GO96.97%
Jammin' JarsPush Gaming96.83%
The Shadow OrderPush Gaming96.73%

Play the free demos

Questions

Which has the higher RTP, Book of Dead or Book of Ra Deluxe?

Book of Dead: 96.21% vs 95.10%.

What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?

Book of Dead: 37.90; Book of Ra Deluxe: 49.00. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.

Can I play both for free?

Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.

Other comparisons

Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data