Great Rhino vs Wolf Gold: RTP, volatility and expected loss
Great Rhino returns 0.52 percentage points more than Wolf Gold (96.53% vs 96.01%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 34.70 vs 39.90 — 5.20 apart. Both sit in the same volatility class (medium), so the swing between sessions is comparable.
Side by side
| Metric | Great Rhino | Wolf Gold |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Pragmatic Play | Pragmatic Play |
| RTP (provider-published) | 96.53% | 96.01% |
| Volatility (Casino-360 class) | medium | medium |
| RTP rank in catalog | Higher RTP than 89% of catalog slots | Higher RTP than 28% of catalog slots |
| Provider average RTP | 96.53% | 96.53% |
| Vs provider average | ±0.00 pp | −0.52 pp |
Catalog: 498 slots.
Expected loss at 1 credit per spin
| Spins | Great Rhino | Wolf Gold | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 3.47 | 3.99 | 0.52 |
| 1,000 | 34.70 | 39.90 | 5.20 |
| 10,000 | 347.00 | 399.00 | 52.00 |
Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →
Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Great Rhino
| Game | Provider | RTP |
|---|---|---|
| Dolphin's Pearl Deluxe | Novomatic | 97.40% |
| Rage to Riches | Play'n GO | 97.12% |
| Royal Masquerade | Play'n GO | 96.92% |
Play the free demos
Questions
Which has the higher RTP, Great Rhino or Wolf Gold?
Great Rhino: 96.53% vs 96.01%.
What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?
Great Rhino: 34.70; Wolf Gold: 39.90. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.
Can I play both for free?
Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.
Other comparisons
Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data