🎰Casino-360

Fire Joker vs Mystery Joker: RTP, volatility and expected loss

Mystery Joker returns 0.83 percentage points more than Fire Joker (96.98% vs 96.15%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 30.20 vs 38.50 — 8.30 apart. Volatility differs: high for Fire Joker, low for Mystery Joker — Fire Joker pays less often but in larger amounts.

Side by side

MetricFire JokerMystery Joker
ProviderPlay'n GOPlay'n GO
RTP (provider-published)96.15%96.98%
Volatility (Casino-360 class)highlow
RTP rank in catalogHigher RTP than 35% of catalog slotsHigher RTP than 99% of catalog slots
Provider average RTP96.44%96.44%
Vs provider average−0.29 pp+0.54 pp

Catalog: 498 slots.

Expected loss at 1 credit per spin

SpinsFire JokerMystery JokerDifference
1003.853.020.83
1,00038.5030.208.30
10,000385.00302.0083.00

Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Fire Joker

GameProviderRTP
Mystery Joker 6000Play'n GO96.97%
Jammin' JarsPush Gaming96.83%
The Shadow OrderPush Gaming96.73%

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Mystery Joker

None in the catalog — it already has the highest RTP in its volatility class.

Play the free demos

Questions

Which has the higher RTP, Fire Joker or Mystery Joker?

Mystery Joker: 96.98% vs 96.15%.

What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?

Fire Joker: 38.50; Mystery Joker: 30.20. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.

Can I play both for free?

Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.

Other comparisons

Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data