🎰Casino-360

Jammin' Jars vs Jammin' Jars 2: RTP, volatility and expected loss

Jammin' Jars returns 0.43 percentage points more than Jammin' Jars 2 (96.83% vs 96.40%). Over 1,000 spins at 1 credit that is an expected loss of 31.70 vs 36.00 — 4.30 apart. Volatility differs: high for Jammin' Jars, very high for Jammin' Jars 2 — Jammin' Jars 2 pays less often but in larger amounts.

Side by side

MetricJammin' JarsJammin' Jars 2
ProviderPush GamingPush Gaming
RTP (provider-published)96.83%96.40%
Volatility (Casino-360 class)highvery high
RTP rank in catalogHigher RTP than 98% of catalog slotsHigher RTP than 53% of catalog slots
Provider average RTP96.58%96.58%
Vs provider average+0.25 pp−0.18 pp

Catalog: 498 slots.

Expected loss at 1 credit per spin

SpinsJammin' JarsJammin' Jars 2Difference
1003.173.600.43
1,00031.7036.004.30
10,000317.00360.0043.00

Expected loss = spins × bet × (1 − RTP). It is the long-run average the RTP implies, not a forecast for one session — volatility decides how far a single session strays from it. Expected loss calculator →

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Jammin' Jars

GameProviderRTP
Mystery Joker 6000Play'n GO96.97%

Higher-RTP slots with the same volatility as Jammin' Jars 2

GameProviderRTP
Wild SwarmPush Gaming97.03%
Big Bass Bonanza - Keeping it ReelPragmatic Play96.71%
Eye of the StormPragmatic Play96.71%

Play the free demos

Questions

Which has the higher RTP, Jammin' Jars or Jammin' Jars 2?

Jammin' Jars: 96.83% vs 96.40%.

What is the expected loss over 1,000 spins at 1 credit?

Jammin' Jars: 31.70; Jammin' Jars 2: 36.00. That is the long-run average, not a forecast for one session.

Can I play both for free?

Yes. Both run as free demos on Casino-360 with virtual credits — no registration, no deposit.

Other comparisons

Source: RTP figures are the theoretical values published by each provider; volatility is Casino-360's four-level classification. Same data as the open dataset at /data. Full RTP database · /data